We've got your back!
CALL NOW (317) 975-1075
Why Loyalty Law? A Different Name for a Different Kind of Firm
When he started this law firm, Jamison Allen could have done what most other injury lawyers do and name the firm after himself. However, he wanted clients and insurance companies to know from the beginning his firm was going to operate differently. Jamison wanted the firm name to accomplish three goals: (1) Reflect his core values, (2) Reinforce his belief that the most important person in the case is the client, and (3) Recognize that success often requires a full team effort. When he discussed proposed names with his family, one suggestion quickly rose above all the others: Loyalty.
​
Loyalty encompasses the core values of the firm: Courage, Integrity, and Justice. Loyalty summarizes the firm's client-focused mission: Restoring Lives by Holding Wrongdoers Accountable. Loyalty also tells injury victims "We've got your back", warns insurance companies to prepare for a fight, and reminds attorneys and staff why we do what we do.
Our mission statement:
Restoring lives by holding wrongdoers accountable.
We help people put their lives back together after an injury. We also stop insurance companies and corporations from hurting people. Quite simply, we help injured people and that is all we do. We know no one can be the best in everything, and we strive to provide the absolute best legal representation to injury victims.
Take five seconds to imagine eating a steak at your favorite steakhouse. Now imagine eating waffles at your favorite breakfast restaurant. Finally, imagine ordering a steak at that breakfast restaurant instead of waffles. Does the law allow the breakfast restaurant to cook a steak? Of course. Do you truly expect the quality of that steak to match the quality of a steak at a real steakhouse? A restaurant tends to be the best when it focuses on one style of food. In the same way, we believe our professional knowledge, skills, and ultimate results are maximized by focusing on one area of law: helping injured people.
Our Core Values
Courage
Loyalty doesn't run from a fight. An injury attorney needs courage to fight giant insurance companies and corporations. Clients have turned to Attorney Jamison when their insurance companies denied their claims. Jamison turned many of those claims into 6-figure settlements.
​
Injury victims deserve an attorney who makes decisions in the clients' best interest, even if sometimes not in the attorney's best interest. Some injury firms operate with a high-volume model that can maximize attorney fees by settling cases low but with little work. This approach usually does not maximize recovery for clients.
On the contrary, insurance companies know Jamison and Loyalty Law have the courage and commitment to work however long it takes to obtain a fair settlement.
Courage requires an attorney to have faith in his own abilities and experience. Courage also requires an attorney to persevere when insurance companies and sometimes even courts create obstacles and delay.
​
Jamison has kept fighting even after trial, appealing cases to the Indiana Court of Appeals and the Indiana Supreme Court and winning the right to a new trial.
Integrity
Insurance companies assess an attorney's integrity and reputation when evaluating a claim. Insurance companies calculate settlement offers by predicting what a jury will think of the case.
If an insurance company thinks a jury will not trust the stereotypical lawyer chosen by the plaintiff, its settlement offers will remain low. However, if an insurance company thinks the attorney has the credibility and experience to connect with a jury, the insurance company will increase the offer to avoid the risk of trial. ​​
Loyalty Law and Jamison Allen carefully protect their reputation and do not accept frivolous cases. Insurance companies know we do not represent those kind of plaintiffs. ​
Integrity includes honesty and transparency, and these virtues differentiate Loyalty Law. Some law firms instruct staff to lie to clients when answering calls and say the lawyer is in court when the lawyer is actually down the hallway and simply does not want to speak. Loyalty Law's employees know honesty is not optional. If the attorney is available to talk, the attorney talks to our client. If the attorney is not available, we schedule a time to speak to our client without lying.
Justice
Justice is simply the reason why we do what we do. When someone injures you and changes your life, our duty is to do everything possible to make it all right again.
​
The practice of law offers many paths to earn income, but only a few paths allow an attorney to simultaneously help innocent people in one of the most difficult moments of their lives.
​
Loyalty Law will never represent an insurance company. We are committed to holding wrongdoers accountable. When you are injured by someone else's carelessness or selfishness, you deserve compensation for medical bills, lost wages and career opportunities, loss of investment in your health, emotional distress, and more. We are especially committed to making sure your own insurance company meets its responsibilities. When you pay premiums for years in exchange but the insurance company breaks its promise to help, we hold the insurance companies responsible.
​
Whenever possible, we use our clients' cases to make the world safer. If a traffic pattern is dangerous, we not only seek compensation for our client, we fight to change the intersection design so no one else is hurt in the future.
Attorney Jamison Allen
Founder and Owner of Loyalty Law
Jamison is best known for winning a $3,000,000 verdict for his 93-year-old client in August 2022 after a mediator recommended settlement at $400,000. As lead counsel, Jamison is proud to know the verdict led insurance companies to increase settlement offers to elderly Hoosiers in other cases.
He has argued cases before the Indiana Court of Appeals, and he is in an exclusive group of injury attorneys who have won an Indiana Supreme Court case. He drafted appellate briefs in Clark v. Mattar, 148 N.E.3d. 988 (Ind. 2020), the case requiring courts to remove jurors who reject the concept of non-economic damages.
